Since the main objective of this study was to assess the difference between the two facial nerve grading systems, the follow-up period itself was not a huge limitation. The exact agreements between regional assessment and FNGS 2. No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported. To date, however, few studies have compared these two grading systems in real patients and confirmed whether FNGS 2.
Use of the two scales in patient prognosis Recovery status was evaluated at 3 months, with grade I of both grading systems defined as complete recovery. It is a widely accepted system, simple, sensitive, accurate and reliable – grading facial function in six steps from normal HB I to total paralysis HB VI. We specialise in plastic surgery, cosmetic surgery, reconstructive surgery of the face, microsurgery, eyelid and oculoplastic surgery, facial nerve surgery, gradlng surgery and breast augmentation. Introduced inthe Yanagihara system is a regional scale most frequently used in Japan. House Brackmann – Facial Nerve Grading SystemĪgreement between the Sunnybrook, House-Brackmann, and Yanagihara facial nerve grading systems in Bell’s palsy. Grade V – Severe Dysfunction Gross: Thus, this scale cannot be used for systematic regional assessment and is limited in determining prognosis. Grade I at 3 months was considered the standard for complete recovery for evaluation of prognosis.
Previously, evaluators focused primarily on whether the eye closed during different degrees of paralysis of each branch of the facial nerve. House-Brackman Scale facial nerve palsy The House-Brackmann scale ranges between I normal and VI no movement. Assessment of facial movement according to House & Brackmann (). Classification necessário treinamento prévio na escala de House & Brackmann. The House–Brackmann score is a score to grade the degree of nerve damage in a facial nerve A modification of the original House–Brackmann score, called the “Facial Nerve Grading Scale ” (FNGS) was proposed in KEYWORDS.
0 kommentar(er)
